<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What digital camera is best for your money?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-eve.com/uncategorized/what-digital-camera-is-best-for-your-money/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-eve.com/uncategorized/what-digital-camera-is-best-for-your-money</link>
	<description>www.digital-eve.com</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mitch b</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-eve.com/uncategorized/what-digital-camera-is-best-for-your-money#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>mitch b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-eve.com/uncategorized/what-digital-camera-is-best-for-your-money#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>Don&#39;t buy into the hype of megapixels.  YOu need to understand, there is a LOT more to picture quality than megapixels - for example shutter speed, aperture options etc.  
Megapixels are something that a lot of manufacturers bump up to up the cost of their cameras - but believe me, if you&#39;re a &#39;point and shoot&#39; type, 6, 7, 8 MP is plenty - and it will save money so that you can buy a higher end camera with that number of megapixels, rather than a piece of junk with the 10-12 you were originally looking for.

Read the geek pages (gizmodo, engadget), search for megapixels and you&#39;ll find a million articles talking about how NOT important MPs are above a certain point, unless you really want to be a professional photographer - in which case point and shoot is not what you want, nor is thin - you&#39;ll want the biggest, most badass SLR you can find (lenses for those are commonly 1000+ for just the lens).&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t buy into the hype of megapixels.  YOu need to understand, there is a LOT more to picture quality than megapixels - for example shutter speed, aperture options etc.<br />
Megapixels are something that a lot of manufacturers bump up to up the cost of their cameras - but believe me, if you&#39;re a &#39;point and shoot&#39; type, 6, 7, 8 MP is plenty - and it will save money so that you can buy a higher end camera with that number of megapixels, rather than a piece of junk with the 10-12 you were originally looking for.</p>
<p>Read the geek pages (gizmodo, engadget), search for megapixels and you&#39;ll find a million articles talking about how NOT important MPs are above a certain point, unless you really want to be a professional photographer - in which case point and shoot is not what you want, nor is thin - you&#39;ll want the biggest, most badass SLR you can find (lenses for those are commonly 1000+ for just the lens).<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VINTAGE MUSIC</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-eve.com/uncategorized/what-digital-camera-is-best-for-your-money#comment-3393</link>
		<dc:creator>VINTAGE MUSIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-eve.com/uncategorized/what-digital-camera-is-best-for-your-money#comment-3393</guid>
		<description>So you really need  at least 10 or 12 megapixels, lolol. Sony DSC-W300.  
13 megapixels, 3X optical zoom. You want very thin, so you can&#39;t want a DSLR. 
 Canon SD880 IS. 4X optical zoom, 10 megapixels. More than 90% of point and shooters do not need 10 megapixels.
 PS- I didn&#39;t want to write a whole chapter but mitch b said it all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you really need  at least 10 or 12 megapixels, lolol. Sony DSC-W300.<br />
13 megapixels, 3X optical zoom. You want very thin, so you can&#39;t want a DSLR.<br />
 Canon SD880 IS. 4X optical zoom, 10 megapixels. More than 90% of point and shooters do not need 10 megapixels.<br />
 PS- I didn&#39;t want to write a whole chapter but mitch b said it all.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aibrean</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-eve.com/uncategorized/what-digital-camera-is-best-for-your-money#comment-3392</link>
		<dc:creator>Aibrean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-eve.com/uncategorized/what-digital-camera-is-best-for-your-money#comment-3392</guid>
		<description>The best is an SLR but they aren&#39;t &#34;thin&#34;. I&#39;d get an XS or XSi Canon Rebel. With a lens you really get more options. A zoom can only go so far but if you have a lens you can trade up for a different one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best is an SLR but they aren&#39;t &quot;thin&quot;. I&#39;d get an XS or XSi Canon Rebel. With a lens you really get more options. A zoom can only go so far but if you have a lens you can trade up for a different one.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeb</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-eve.com/uncategorized/what-digital-camera-is-best-for-your-money#comment-3391</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-eve.com/uncategorized/what-digital-camera-is-best-for-your-money#comment-3391</guid>
		<description>The best camera is Sony cybershot 10 megapixel it is superb and good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.pricelooker.co.uk/d~c-electronics~b-3.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best camera is Sony cybershot 10 megapixel it is superb and good.<br /><b>References : </b><br /><a href="http://www.pricelooker.co.uk/d~c-electronics~b-3.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.pricelooker.co.uk/d~c-electronics~b-3.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
