Nikon D3x Preview by What Digital Camera magazine
Filed under: Uncategorized

WDC takes a first look at the new Nikon D3x professional DSLR, announced on 1st December 2008.

Duration : 0:3:39


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

admin @ 4:02 pm

25 Comments for 'Nikon D3x Preview by What Digital Camera magazine'

  1.  
    porschech
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    I tried this camera …
    I tried this camera to day :D very good, but In Norway you have to pay over 10000 dollars :D lol

  2.  
    Brennboy
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    Nikon is the best …
    Nikon is the best and I can’t wait to upgrade my D2x with this beauty.

    If you can’t afford it, stop complaining and be happy with your little Sony.

  3.  
    WilBloodworth
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    Spoken like someone …
    Spoken like someone who doesn’t own the $500 SB-900. I own both and the SB-900 is totally different (and much better) than the SB-800.

  4.  
    lolrgf
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    are you stupid?
    are you stupid?

  5.  
    bpopd
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    You are right. I …
    You are right. I do know of a certain individual who has pre-ordered one already, regardless of the market slump.

  6.  
    mattblack77nz
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    Blah, blah, blah! …
    Blah, blah, blah! If you don’t like the price, don’t buy one. Why does everyone feel the need to sit and complain about the price?

  7.  
    chsjumper11
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    photography is very …
    photography is very expensive in itself no matter what level you are at

    chances are the people who do buy this camera as well as any other DSLR are not too adversely affected by this recession and are financially stable

  8.  
    emachuca
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    The $8,000 D3x is …
    The $8,000 D3x is Nikon’s greatest scam just after releasing a $500 flash that does nothing better than the old $300 flash, not to mention the $500 GPS unit that easily cost less than $50 to manufacture.

  9.  
    Tortphoto
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    Nikon and Sony’s …
    Nikon and Sony’s technology that is put into the sensors are deferent. nikon handles noise much better then the sony

  10.  
    rustynasty143
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    Don’t confuse your …
    Don’t confuse your self here, its a sony sensor and sony manufacturer. nikon don,t design their own sensor only the body thats why its a sony sensor got it.

  11.  
    bpopd
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    nope, sony just …
    nope, sony just manufactures nikon’s sensors. But is it owned by sony, nope. It’s designed by Nikon’s engineers, sony is only the manufacturer. But since there was already a 24.5mp sensor available from Sony, Nikon might have taken that sensor as a baseline to rework.

  12.  
    bpopd
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    people have always …
    people have always complained, but they got use to it, and nikon decided to release a $8000 camera during a recession that’s felt worldwide…

    it’s like adding oil to the fire.

  13.  
    bpopd
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    D3 is 14bit
    D3 is 14bit

  14.  
    bpopd
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    d3x is 16bit.
    d3x is 16bit.

  15.  
    sdsaadosh
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    thank u but what …
    thank u but what about D3’s sensor ?

  16.  
    tellyworth
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    The A900 sensor is …
    The A900 sensor is 12 bit. The D3X sensor is 14 bit. Not the same sensor.

  17.  
    gr2k
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    how come nobody …
    how come nobody says anything when the 1Ds is launched? its also just a FF version of the 1D

  18.  
    rustynasty143
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    d3x sony sensor yes …
    d3x sony sensor yes, but in a nikon badge thats why its so expensive. Yes indeed probably will flop they should have release this 2 years earlier.

  19.  
    CAPTAINCAPSLOCKZ
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    or just can buy a …
    or just can buy a awesome car and a 150€ camera?

  20.  
    ctbrg
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    And lest we forget …
    And lest we forget Canon’s new 5D Mark II with 21.1 mp being offered at $2600 to $2700 USD. That sensor is newly designed and the body was improved. Why does nikon have to charge so much more for less or equal product?

  21.  
    MoOkS187
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    Sony > Nikon
    Sony > Nikon

  22.  
    thomasward00
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    This sensor is made …
    This sensor is made by Sony and is basically a tweaked version of the A900 sensor, at more than double the price.

  23.  
    thomasward00
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    Nikon D3X 8K, Sony …
    Nikon D3X 8K, Sony A900 3K and basically the same SONY sensor…

    Hmmmmm the Nikon is more than double the price of the Sony…

    This camera will be a major flop for Nikon

  24.  
    sarawing
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    Actually they just …
    Actually they just changed the lable from D3 to D3x~

    and give it a new firmware to use all the pixels on the that Sensor.

  25.  
    sarawing
    December 25, 2008 | 4:02 pm
     

    Come on~ Dont you …
    Come on~ Dont you know D3x and D3 share the same sensor?

    If I have $8000, I can buy D3+D700+D300

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Instruction for comments :

You can use these tags:
XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



RSS Feed for comments | TrackBack URI

 
Theme by Theme by Robert