Brewster Kahle: A digital library, free to the world
Filed under: Uncategorized

http://www.ted.com Brewster Kahle is building a truly huge digital library — every book ever published, every movie ever released, all the strata of web history … It’s all free to the public — unless someone else gets to it first.

Duration : 0:20:7


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

admin @ 8:12 pm

25 Comments for 'Brewster Kahle: A digital library, free to the world'

  1.  
    irelandauctionhouse
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    a lot of copyrights …
    a lot of copyrights to obtain, internet access that would be needed, there is already wikipedia, pirate bay to download 20,000 books.

  2.  
    angeleyes0thebad
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    in the beginning of …
    in the beginning of the video he said that he is a librarian.

  3.  
    enterfailedment
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     


    Duuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmbbbbbbbbb

  4.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    Okay, here’s a …
    Okay, here’s a little topic for you geekheads:

    Contrast the German and Italian approaches to books, printing, and librairies.

    Technogeek can’t even grasp the question, let alone answer it.

  5.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    And? What has that …
    And? What has that got to do with this idiot’s program?

    Nothing. In fact his proposal will make “books” and “knowledge” less accessible digitally.

    The fuckhead does not even know what “books” are, nor libraries.

  6.  
    marsCubed
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    “In fact the old …
    “In fact the old Soviets had a pastepot squad that continuously revised the Soviet Encyclopedia”
    All Encyclopaedias are continuously revised. it is called keeping them up to date. Or is the use of a “pastepot” the problem here?

    Digitizing books makes them accessible to more people. This is a good thing. Also digitized books means that they can be read by a computer making them accessible to even more people. Then of course there is the possibility of using meta data.

  7.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    Okay, here;s a …
    Okay, here;s a little topic for you geekheads:

    Contrast the German and Italian approaches to books, printing, and librairies.

    Technogeek can’t even grasp the question, let alone answer it.

  8.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    “Knowledge” is not …
    “Knowledge” is not a collection.

    This geek is a living contradcition of what he is trying to sell you.

    He is an ignorant fuckhead who pretends to know things he does not know.

    He doesn’t know the ancient Greeks or Alexandria from a hole in the wall.

    He doesn’t know books either.

  9.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    And he knows …
    And he knows about libraries.

    He’s a technogeek pushing technological solutions for problems he invents.

  10.  
    marsCubed
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    mopsius He invented …
    mopsius He invented Wide Area Information Servers amongst other things, and came up with the free archive of which he is the Director.
    Your comment is not sensible.

  11.  
    TroyWorks
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    Interesting stats:

    Interesting stats:

    China 1 Million books scanned
    India 300K books scanned
    Egypt 30K books scanned

  12.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    Yes, that is a …
    Yes, that is a problem too. Traditional books disappear and digital ones are revised periodically.

    In fact the old Soviets had a pastepot squad that continuously revised the Soviet Encyclopedia.

    How much easier with digital.

  13.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    Listen carefully to …
    Listen carefully to what he actually says.

    In fact, he doesn’t know enough to know what he means.

    He should not be in charge of this project.

    He will make a God-awful mess.

  14.  
    klkbk
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    This sounds like a …
    This sounds like a great idea in theory, but in reality it is a way to replace hard copy books with a “computer book”. Once this system is in place, and hard copy books are at a minimum, sensorship and control of knowlege will ensue along with a history of the books a person reads!

  15.  
    Tonaho
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    I’m pretty sure he …
    I’m pretty sure he means all COLLECTED knowledge.

  16.  
    jezobeljones
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    and you are a …
    and you are a stupid troll. go away.

  17.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    Read my comments …
    Read my comments carefully, and think.

    I am not against digitizing libraries.

    That is not the point.

  18.  
    McArrowni
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    I think this is a …
    I think this is a good idea.
    Some books might have historic value that will not be understood until later. It’s going to be a small cost on the long run to do this anyways.

    Though of course for non-historian, I’m betting web-based encyclopedias similar to wikipedia will be more practical.

  19.  
    Valetudo21
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    A lot of books are …
    A lot of books are trash, I am not sure if I support every book being scanned since it is most likely tax payer money doing this.

  20.  
    Valetudo21
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    I do not understand …
    I do not understand why you think this guy is an idiot?

  21.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    “Universal access …
    “Universal access to all knowledge is now within our grasp”

    What a dumb shithead.

  22.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    Dumb …
    Dumb cokehead technogeeks.

  23.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    This guy is a …
    This guy is a messianic idiot.

  24.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    This is, as stated, …
    This is, as stated, a really dumb idea.

    How about collecting all the books in the world on libraries.

    Now what have you got. A worthless pile of that will take you a lifetime to peruse.
    and after you preuse you will say–you just wasted nine hours of my time for one good hour.

  25.  
    mopsius
    January 13, 2009 | 8:12 pm
     

    Say you have an …
    Say you have an access system for 100 million volumes.

    You will be wasting ten more times the time than you would be with a well-chosen ten million.

    And that is true even on a computer.

    Only an idiot librarian who did not understand books would come up with a lunatic idea like this.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Instruction for comments :

You can use these tags:
XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



RSS Feed for comments | TrackBack URI

 
Theme by Theme by Robert